All posts by Larry Lopez

The economic potential of indigenous and tribal tourism

Image source: pixabay.com

There are approximately 370 million people that belong to the indigenous communities in the world and they make up 5% of the global population. While their survival has been constantly pressured by modernity and pressures of the emerging societies, they continue to thrive, occupying a quarter of the planet’s surface area, and most importantly, protecting 80% of the world’s remaining biodiversity.

Their pure knowledge of their culture and innate talent in protecting nature make indigenous communities one of the most important sectors of a country. To be able to face the challenges of the modern world and at the same time, sustain and maintain the environment that they promised to protect, they are presented with one solution that will not only help them conserve their heritage but will also promote economic and cultural benefits in their home country.

In fact, researchers estimate that the immediate global value of culture and heritage-based tourism can reach over $1 billion. In regions from the Asia Pacific, tourism-driven from partnerships with the indigenous community has reached over $320 million. Employment generation is also another advantage of focusing on cultural and ethnic tourism, with over 50 million jobs and 75 million related employments (indirect benefits) in several APEC countries.

Travel industry experts and local government leaders have successfully presented the necessary guidelines to work with indigenous communities to create the foundations of sustainable tourism.

Their efforts include interacting with members of the indigenous communities and sharing knowledge and information to help safeguard their natural resources. It also involves reviewing already existing codes set by the indigenous groups and other concerned organizations.

What makes social insurance a crucial government lifeline?

In definition, a social insurance is a government-supported program that provides benefits and assistance to its citizens of a particular social standing. This means that a social insurance program has eligibility requirements that are defined by specific qualifications set by a bill or law.

A social insurance program’s source of funds may come from taxes or the premiums paid by—or in some instances, paid for—eligible participants but other sources of funding are also available. Since there are just select citizens who can benefit from social insurance, contributions are compulsory. However, beneficiaries do not view it as an obligation but a rewarding exchange, especially since these types of programs are often heavily subsidized.

Image source: pixabay.com

 

One of the goals of a social insurance program is to prevent a population from falling to the heaviest burden of poverty and most importantly, to provide assistance during medical or financial emergencies. As a type of insurance, it is a device that offers compensation and comfort from the losses during such emergencies.

The most common form of compensation is in the form of healthcare assistance in which a network of healthcare professionals and institutions are accessible to eligible individuals, depending on the type of health care plan that they have availed. In return, the government makes sure that these health care providers are well compensated for their services.

In the United States, there are several social insurance programs that take care of qualified citizens. One example is the joint state and federal program, Medicaid, and another form social insurance service includes unemployment compensation. In Japan, a country known for its old population, has a special social insurance program for people between 40 to 65 years old, called, the Nursing Insurance.

Shaping cities: why urban planning is a vital economic determinant

Image source: pixabay.com

Cities come in different shapes and sizes. Some are compact, circular, others have irregular shapes, and some can appear fragmented. The important question to ask here is, why do these observations matter, especially when talking about an economically efficient urban space?

How does the geographical shape of an urban environment determine its economic development and potential? Experts point out that different city structures have different economic implications. Moreover, while some urban spaces benefit from their design, some are constrained by their own geographies.

In fact, urban planning has been a significant factor in developing modern cities that are more economically competitive than their other counterparts. The concept that the shape of city matters, especially from the perspective of economists, is an important one in that it has been recognized as a determinant of a city’s efficiency.

Urban planning, by definition, is a technical as well as a political process of developing and designing urban areas. While its primary concern is public welfare, effective urban planning should also concern bringing out the economic potential of a new city.

Considerations of how planners shape a city often concentrate on sanitation, efficiency, and use and protection of the environment. Most importantly, how planning promotes social and economic activities within and beyond these spaces have also been a major focus for developers.

That is why economic analysis has been deemed an essential process in building cities. One’s mastery of urban as well as regional planning, as experts point out, should also be complemented with an expertise in both micro and macroeconomics. Most importantly, urban planners should have the skills set to apply these concepts in regional economies, urban markets, as well as government finances.

Despite conflicts, the US-China Trade relationship is a significant one

Image source: CNN

 

The balanced trading agreements and economically productive relationships among the most powerful countries have kept the world a better and safer place. The optimism towards healthy international relations among these nations have so far, benefited the markets and the global economy – and what happens when two economic giants would come to a massive trade disagreement will not only send ripples but huge waves that have the power to wipe out everything on their way.

The exact scenario recently made headlines when two economically dominant nations, China and the United States, started waging what experts tagged as an on-going “trade war.” Many suggest this event has the potential to reshape the two countries’ economy and the global markets as a whole.

Commonly known as the US-Chinese Relations, the trade relationship between the United States and China is a powerful yet complicated one. The former holds the title as having the world’s largest economy while the latter ranks second. Although their current relationship has been riddled with conflicts, and the current threats of the present trade war, it has proven to be a strong and stable one ever since it began in 1949.

Today, the rough yet productive trade relationship between U.S. and China is actually supporting over 2.6 million jobs in American, benefiting several industries in the country. In 2015, records show that Chinese consumption and buying power brought in over $160 million to the country’s exports and their economic output.

China, on the other hand, became the third largest destination of goods and services from the U.S. (as of 2000 ranking), directly and indirectly contributing growth to the Chinese economy.

For more insights on global economies, finance, and investing as a whole, follow LOM Financial on Facebook and visit their official website.

Methods that help Central Banks influence a country’s money supply

Image source: pixabay.com

 

The role of central banks in every country’s economic prosperity is an irreplaceable one. As a core part of a nation’s financial and monetary machinery, these institutions have helped every economy in the world maintain stability and growth.

One example of a central bank’s important contributions to their home country’s overall economic operations is their influence on money supply. It is a fact that an economy may sometimes need more money, and there are other times when it needs less – and there are specific methods that only central banks have the power to implement.

However, these methods normally depend on the amount of power bestowed in a country’s central bank and of course, the current economic weather in that country.

The American Central bank, for instance, influences the country’s money supply by directly modifying its reserve requirements. In other words, the Fed deploys a method that can affect the relationship between the number of fund banks and deposits of inbank accounts – with the goal of increasing the total supply of money in the U.S. economy.

On the other hand, if there is a need to reduce the Fed’s money supply, they have the option to sell bonds. Doing so will result in a lesser amount of money reserve to lend to its borrowers. With less money to lend, it leads to an increase in the central bank’s interest rate, affecting the value of the U.S. dollar.

Printing more money is also another method to increase a central bank’s money supply, but its consequences prevent countries to print as much as they want. This is because; the presence of more printed money makes a currency less valuable against other currencies.

For more about monetary systems, currencies, capital markets, and the finance industry as a whole, visit LOM Financial’s official website or follow them on Facebook.

 

How global sporting events like the FIFA World Cup reinvigorate the economy

Image source: pixabay.com

International sporting events have long been a great source of entertainment and inspiration for the millions of fans around the world. While the spotlight goes to the best teams and their most valuable players, the economic impact of international sports events is not often given its place in the podium.

For many people, this is always a big question: Despite the fact that hosting international sporting competitions cost millions to billions of dollars, why are countries still willing to take in this responsibility? Most importantly, why do hundreds of member countries spend and invest in these events in the first place? The answer lies in how it directly affects the national and global economy.

The FIFA World Cup, for instance, has brought a significant impact not only on the economy of its host country but it has also made its economic presence felt on a global scale. This is because, hosting sports events like the World Cup can easily ensure inflows of foreign capital, directly generating local employment and promoting tourism.

Opportunities for employment and a boost for other industries such as banking, hospitality, and construction to name a few, are some of the many aspects that can eventually encourage and reinvigorate the confidence for investments.

While most major sporting events take place in relatively large countries like the US, Brazil, China, and Russia, there are smaller jurisdictions that host athletic spectacles that may be lower in profile but equally global in scale. The 2017 America’s Cup, for example, took place in the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda (home to major offshore investment institutions like LOM Financial). The 2022 World Cup, meanwhile, is expected to be hosted for the first time by the small GCC nation of Qatar.

Although hosts invest billions of dollars to provide the proper infrastructure to support events like these, analysts have always been positive of a generous return of investment. Russia, the host for 2018’s World Cup, for instance, expects $31 billion economic impacts, according to its organizers.

Should investors worry about inflation?

Image source: pixabay.com

In definition, inflation takes place when there is a noticeable rise in the prices of both goods and services, resulting in an equal fall of a currency’s purchasing power. This event has majorly caused serious financial woes especially for fix-waged earners, but this period can also be challenging especially for investors looking at long-term goals.

How inflation affects investors will depend on their choice of investment. Basically, as the implicit value of money fails, long-term investors have to worry about how inflation can slowly take away real savings, devaluing investment returns and at the same time, decreasing their long-term purchasing power.

Unprotected investment portfolios that lack enough diversification can be the top victim of inflation. For instance, investors who look forward to a stable income stream from fixed income securities find inflation as their number one threat. Most fixed income securities carry the same rate of interest until maturity, making its purchasing power vulnerable to decline.

As a response to the risks posed by inflation, experts—such as LOM Financial—suggest investing in equities as a more flexible and safer alternative. With this type of investment vehicle, there’s a higher possibility that the value of one’s investment can have the chance to fight the effects of inflation.

However, investing in equities doesn’t protect you from other threats that could make you lose your money. This investment option carries a high risk and should be carefully studied and assessed. Such risks are understandably a major consideration in how portfolios must be designed, including offshore discretionary management accounts.

Of course, your investing strategies should ultimately depend on your financial goals and how you want to survive in the world of investing. The only way to protect yourself from these risks is to stay informed, learn from your failures, and remember the lessons of your success.

Offshore financial centers and how they thrive on near-zero taxation

Image source: LOM Financial

 

Most countries generate revenue via different sources and national taxation is one of them. Two of the biggest national income providers come from the citizen’s personal income tax and the domiciled companies’ corporate taxes, but what happens to jurisdictions who decided not to impose them?

Offshore financial centers (OFCs) are often asked the same question: how can these geographically small nations afford not to impose corporate and personal income taxes? Since it’s impossible to support the economic growth of these countries, how will they make up for the loss from the absence of these revenue-generating systems?

The truth is, OFCs enjoy several benefits than other nations but it doesn’t mean that they’re completely tax-free. The taxation system in the Cayman Islands, for instance, supplement the loss of corporate taxes by imposing several measures like increasing tax requirements for imported goods, resulting in a higher cost of living. This means that while employees enjoy a completely zero income tax environment, they have to pay higher for their daily, living expenses.

One of the most interesting facts about the Cayman Islands is the number of domiciled companies in this jurisdiction: approximately over a hundred thousand – that’s almost twice their territory’s total population. This impressive statistics also means one thing: while there is no corporate tax collected from over 100,000 companies based in this offshore investment center, the government still earns by imposing registration fees as not just a one-time payment since an annual renewal fee for continued operations is also required.

Indeed, tax revenues from a growing business environment as well as the spending power of a particular population make up a large percentage of the national income, but there is also one sector that contributes to its total earnings: the tourism industry. From this highly active sector, tropical OFC destinations earn from collecting departure taxes as soon as tourists exit the country.

The strangest ways today’s superstars were discovered

The most talented superstars on the planet were once just like you – a normal person, living and just doing what they love, until that one fateful and not to mention strange encounter changed their lives forever. Here are some of the strangest ways celebrities were discovered to become who they are now:

Justin Bieber and Youtube

Image source: scroll.in

Youtube, the video sharing platform was just in its early years when the 12-year old Justin Bieber was discovered. It was in 2007 when produced Scooter Braun accidentally clicked on Bieber’s video, with the then child Youtuber singing Chris Brown’s famous hit, With You. Braun was able to track the young singer and the next awesome thing happened – Bieber got the chance to perform for the multi-awarded singer/songwriter/producer Usher. Fast forward, Justin Bieber has sold over 15 million albums and has a net worth of $200 million.

Natalie Portman and a pizza place

Image source: revengeofthefans.com

After a dance class, 10-year old Natalie Portman and her mom decided to drop by a pizza place and just talk about how the day went – but fate decided that it was where her life will change for good. While casually enjoying her slice of pizza, a representative from a modeling agency approached her and offered her a job. However, Portman didn’t like the idea of people judging her by her physical looks so she instead, asked for the team’s acting agency contacts. Today, Natalie Portman is one of the top celebrities in the world, with an estimated net worth of $54 million.

Charlize Theron and the bank “drama”

Image source: variety.com

Imagine being discovered as a dramatic actress for just being a literal drama queen? Well, that’s exactly what happened to Charlize Theron. While at a bank, an agent at the end of the queue noticed this South African beauty in the middle of her outrage towards a bank representative. Coupled with Theron’s animated movements and vocal prowess, in the eyes of the agent, she was a superstar – and she indeed became one. Today, she has a staggering net worth of $110 million, starring in billion-dollar box office worldwide.

REPOST: 5 Myths Of “Making It” In The Music Industry

Some of the world’s wealthiest and most successful people are musicians. However, having a knack for melodies and singing in the right tune aren’t the only considerations to make it big in the business. Hypebot.com explains it further here:

With so much advice about finding success in the music industry, there are a number of romanticized myths floating around that have gained more traction than they deserve. Here we debunk five such misconceptions.

In this industry it can be easy to get overwhelmed with all the information being blasted at us 24/7. Do this, don’t do that. This works, that doesn’t. It can be tough to know which advice to follow, and which to stay far away from.

As someone who has been in the industry for the last 10 years as a writer for my own and several other publications, a music publicist, an occasional booker of local shows, and an all around observer, there are a few myths that I see bands still living by, despite any proof they actually work—most of them end up actually being detrimental. Here they are:

If your music is good enough, the labels/managers/festivals will find you
This is the number one belief that I see most artists still hanging on to, despite any proof that it’s actually been the case over the last say, 20 years or so (at least). Long gone are the days where you can have nothing going for you except talent and a catchy hook and have a label come by, scoop you up, take care of all the marketing/booking/fan experiences, and just sit back and play your music. It’s just not going to happen.

Labels want to see strong proof that you’re actually marketable (IE: you’ll make them money) before “taking a chance” on you, which means before they’re even remotely interested you need to have proven yourself through engaging social media pages, successful tours, fans that are willing to support you, etc. Once you’ve done all of that, then people start paying attention.

Continue reading HERE.